Bismillahirrahmanirrahim
PLACE OF RELIGION IN THE UNIVERSE
/Translation from bulgarian/

The Universe is object of research and study to the Astronomy. For its part the astronomy consists of two exact sciences – mathematics and physics. And no self-estimating person could dare reject these sciences.

The mankind has always been interested in the question: what it is beyond the Earth? Still in the antiquity people observed the near and the distant cosmic bodies and tried to explain the observed occurrences. In the course of science development the nature of the occurrences becomes clearer.

The science is system (combination) of knowledge about objective laws for development of nature, society and thinking and about the nature of the occurrences.

The science is clear, exact, objective and definite, takes no side in certain disputes, puts the things in the right light – such as they are. The science develops all-round with accelerated rates, having in mind that only 500 years ago it was considered that the Earth is in the center of the world (the Universe), however, further astronomical developments refute this. A later conception about the central position of Sun in the galaxy has also been refuted from knowledge development. The galaxy where we are found also does not take a privileged position in the Universe – it is only one of the galaxies taking part in the expansion, in the endless Universe development. The galaxies are the basic mass of the Universe – they contain different number of stars; according to the scientific literature the galaxies contain from one million to thousand billion stars – the biggest of them were called giant galaxies.

According to the contemporary astronomy the number of the galaxies in the cosmic space is about 200 billion. Some sources point that the galaxies are about 50 billion, in other they are about 100 billion and in third sources it is said that they are about 200 billion. The exact number of stars and galaxies is not important for me, I am interested in their motions, which form hierarchical order of the bodies in the cosmos, on which depends the life existence.

For example: the first stage Earth’s motion in the cosmic space around its own axis – one rotation takes 24 hours; this motion assures the change of day and night – Fig.1. If the planet Earth does not rotate around its axis, there could not be life on it, because the part, where it is day always, will be burned to ashes from the high temperatures, and the part where it is night always will be ice bound. Therefore the change of the day and the night assures the harmony for life existence. I would like only to explain that if the time interval of this rotation was different from 24 hours, the climate on the Earth will also be different from this now, and the Earth might be uninhabited.

The second stage is the Earth’s motion around the Sun; in this case the period is 365,25 day motion, which assures the change of the seasons – Fig.2. The third stage is the motion of the Sun around its own axis; because of its crumbly surface the motion period around its whole surface is not the same, it varies around 28-30 day – Fig.3. The fourth stage is the motion of the Sun on the orbit around the galaxy’s axis, the motion period is about 200-250 million earth years – Fig.4.

The fifth stage is the galaxy motion around its own axis perpendicular of galactic plane. It is assumed that the rotation period is about 50 million earth years – Fig.5.

Sixth stage – the galaxies form heap of galaxies; the number of the galaxies in a heap is different from 20-30 galaxies to 2500 galaxies – Fig.6.

The galaxy with the biggest mass serves as center of the heap. Seventh stage – the scientists has ascertained the existence of heaps formed from other galactic heaps – overgalactic heap, where the galactic heaps mote on orbit in the overgalactic heap – Fig.7.

From this motions the first, the third and the fifth stage are motions around the own axis of the bodies and the other – the second, the fourth, the sixth and the seventh stage are motions on orbits. During the lectures in philosophy I read a phrase “The higher forms of motion contains in themselves lower motions, but they are not reduced to simpler”, in other words the overgalactic heap contains in itself all other motions, but its motion is not reduced to the motion of the bodies from the other stages. When we gather this motions around one point, it comes out that is on Fig.8.

























SCHEME OF THE HIERARCHICAL ORDER OF THE BODIES IN THE COSMOS I Group
Periods’ duration of bodies’ rotation

Fig.1
The planet Earth
- 1 day
- 24 hours

Fig.2
The Solar system
- 365,25 days
- 8766 hours

II Group
Fig.3
Sun
- 28-30 days
- 672-720 hours

Fig.4
Galactic system
- ≈ 200-250 million earth years

III Group
Fig.5
Galaxy
- ≈ 50 million earth years

Fig.6
Galactic heap
- …………………

IV Group
Fig.7
Overgalactic heap
- ………………...

Fig.8
The Kaabe temple in Mekka

Fig.9
Cosmic bodies, which take part in the hierarchical order:
1. Planet Earth
2. Sun
3. Galaxy
4. Galactic heap
5. Overgalactic heap

Seven times is walking round the Kaabe temple
The 4 times are called “farz”
The 3 times are called “vacip”

From scientific point of view there are total seven hierarchical rows in the Universe, three of which are motion around bodies’ own axis and four of them are motion on orbits.

The religious point of view is that the Kaabe temple in Mekka is gone round seven times, three of them are called “vacip”, and the other four are called “farz”. Farz is obligation, which should be implemented strictly and without exceptions. After farz the vacip is second important stage.

I would like to tell you about the reasons which incite me to this way of thinking and further progress of the things. When I was discharged from military service on January 2000 I was 20 years old, I do not have a job, and there was nothing to do at home because it was in the middle of the winter. I had enough time to stay alone with my thoughts. I began to analyze my past and what did I go through, what did I experiences in connection with the religion. Still in my childhood I was very interested in religious issues, but in my family and in my circle there were not well-educated persons in this field and they often said me “learn your lessons at school, you are not going to become an imam”. The fault is not their, because during the socialist regime the Islam classes were forbidden at school many generations in succession. My father had been 6 years old when the Islam classes were forbidden at school, and when he had been 14 years old when the classes in Turkish language were also forbidden. When I was 5 years old our names were changed and talking Turkish was forbidden. I remember that when we went in the hospital to visit my grandfather, I called my father in Turkish and a man appears from somewhere and imposed a fine of 5 lv., my father paid the fine, he did not say anything, but after this occurrence I traveled rarer to the town.

Shortly after the Bulgarisation in 1989 our rights to study Islam outside school were restored. The old people in the village organized courses in Koran reading, conducted by the imam of the village. Our history teacher was not pleased with this and once in the history class when we were studying the religions he said partially that the Judeans are God’s elect but subsequently they had not stand the tests and failed, because of that God sent his only son to lead them to the salvation and in this way arose the Christianity.

In this train of thought he said that the Arabians in order not to take sides had thought out their own religion led by Mohammed, who had proclaimed himself be a prophet. The teacher said that one part of the Koran Mohammed had copied out from the Bible and the other part he has thought out and in this way he managed to unite all Arabians. Furthermore he said that prophet Mohammed had made mistakes: first of them was that he has accepted a heathen custom – the walking round the Kaabe temple in Mekka; heathen custom, because it had existed before the prophet Mohammed’s birth; according to the teacher this custom was illogical. The second mistake, which the teacher pointed out was, that prophet Mohammed had defined that the days in the year are 355 instead of the astronomical 365,25 – or 10 days less. In teacher’s opinion the prophet’s mistakes were evident, but the Arabians followed him blindly. At this time our imam migrated to Turkey, nobody else undertook to continue our Islamic education, our group was dismissed. Bit by bit I became infatuated with themes about the cosmos, the endlessness of the Universe has attracted my attention. We have some books on astronomy at home, which were presents for my biggest brother from his teachers, because of his excellent marks during his primary education. In the beginning he did not give me the books because I was a little boy and scrawled on them, but when he finished his education and went working, this books were completely at my disposal. Finally one of the books was so used up that the last pages tore; when my brother saw the book he made me a remark. I told him that this book is valuable for me, and he asked me if this was the way to keep books of true merit.

During my secondary education in the literature classes we laid emphasis on the religious themes; we have learned about the Christian culture and Islamic influence during Ottoman Empire. The teacher emphasized the same elements of Islam – the walking round the Kaabe temple in Mekka, seven times, and the 335 days of the year. The walking round the Kaabe temple was also illogical for my teacher.

She said “they are walking round the temple in this heat like crazy without seeing their god and then they fight for him” ( “without seeing their god” – she had in mind the ban for representation on icons). For herself and Christianity she said “we see our god at least, light a candle in front of his image and so we otter prayers. After that she pardoned the Moslem part of the class and said “You are not such people”; she said that her criticism is directed to the ottomans from the past, but there was in her voice a touch of hate and abhorrence for the Islam. In those years I fasted during the Ramadan month, not the whole month but parts of it; because of the fasting they called me at home with various nicknames and I on my part had hidden behind my mother’s actions, because after my grandparent’s death she was the only one in the family who was fasting “oruc”.

Later when I became a soldier I was witness to a colonel-commander’s speech, who blamed the Moslems for the wars around the world. It was surprisingly that he emphasized the same arguments that the Moslems are walking round the stone in this heat without seeing their god and then they fight for him, and the Christians are praying in front of God’s icon. He was boasting that they can see His image. After I was discharged from military service this made me ponder very thoroughly (after my abilities). I believe in God’s existence and I believe in the Day of Judgment, that after death everyone will response for his acts. The ability to study and profess the religion I belonged to, was deprived many years before my birth. Now I am looking for a relation to the reality, I believe that there is such a relation. In my prayers I was praying to Allah because I come from a Moslem family, but this fact was not sufficient any more. It was inevitable to ask myself about the position of all religions: Judaism, Christianity, Islam, Buddhism and other smaller religions, which apparently contradict each other. The question was: What is the last will of the Creator? I strived for the truth such it is. I was ready to adopt any one of these religions, if it is the God’s last will.

One night I prayed to Almighty Allah to realize the things and to choose His last will, to serve Him in order not to be one of the misbelievers on the Day of Judgment. I promised that if I realize the truth I will stand for it until I can. I began to read religious manuals, which I received from my relatives, who live in Turkey. In this books the religions were divided into divine and non-divine, I read them carefully, I was impartial to the facts, my aim was to find for me the truth and completely trust it.

The non-divine religions honor the idols, the pilgrims make them statues and take them for divinity (the created are honored like creators), there are no prophets in these religions.

In the divine religions God’s commandments are revealed to the people through a man, elected from God and called prophet.

The three divine religions and their prophets were described as follow: The Judaism is presented to the people by Prophet Moses. God had elected Moses for prophet in order to rescue the Israeli from pharaoh’s exploitation. However, in the course of the time the Israeli transformed the religion from universal into national. In other words if you are not from their nation, it is impossible to learn and profess their religion. The Judeans accept all revelation given to Prophet Moses, but they do not accept those given to Prophet Jesus and Prophet Mohammed. The holy writ given to Moses is the Torah. The Torah’s authenticity is not preserved; it has undergone changes during the years.

The Christianity is presented to the people by Prophet Jesus – because of the fact that of God’s will Jesus has been born without presence of father, his followers proclaimed him be a divinity. The Christianity honors all revelations given to the all prophets except those given to Prophet Mohammed. The holy writ given to Jesus is the Gospel. Soon after the end of his man’s life, the followers of Jesus rewrote the Gospel and included events, which occurred after his death. Because of that many Gospels appears, which were totally different. This made the Byzantine emperor summon a counsel of highest level in 325 a.Ch.. He had gathered all Gospels in the empire and reduced their number to four, which authors are: Mathew, Marcos, Luka and Joan. Despite all this there were some contradictions between them. The Islam is presented to the people by the prophet Mohammed. The Holy writ of the Islam is the Koran. Among all Holy writs on the earth, the Koran is the only one, which is preserved in its authentic form. It has not undergo changes during the years. In the sacred Koran Allah ordain: “really we ….. the Reminding (the Koran) and we will preserve it by all means” – suresi “Hicr-9”. After Koran’s advent lost the other divine books their validity. The Islam accepts and honors all prophets without exceptions from Adem (Adam) to Mohammed.
In the Koran are mentioned the names of twenty five prophets and they are as follows:
1.Adem (Adam)
2.Idris (Enoch)
3.Nuh (Noah)
4.Hud
5.Salih
6.Ibrahim (Abraham)
7.Ismail
8.Ishak (Ishaak)
9.Lut (Lot)
10.Jakub (James)
11.Usuf (Joseph)
12.Eijub (Job)
13.Suaib
14.Musa (Moses)
15.Harun (Aaron)
16.Davud (David)
17.Suleyman (Solomon)
18.Zulkifl
19.Unus (Jona)
20.Iljas (Elijah
21.Eljesa
22.Zekeria (Zachariah)
23.Jaha (John the Baptist)
24.Isa (Jesus)
25. Mohammed

It is explained in the Koran that there is no difference between the prophets: suresi – Ali Imran, ayet – 84. All of them are elects of uniform God Allah. They were send to the people at different time and in different societies around the world.

After all this it was clear for me, that the Islam is the last will of the Almighty Allah. I have a booklet with instruction for performance of Salah, which contains the last ten suresi of the Koran, which should be read at Salah. I want to memorize a suresi, which describes in the best way the God’s nature. I choose this one of the ten: suresi “Ihljas” – which reads: 1.Tell me /oh, Mohammed/: He is Allah – the only one, 2.Allah, the aim (of all strivings): He did not bear, and he is not born, 4. and He is nobody equal”. I have learned the Arabic version of this suresi. I have often read it low. I wished to be found some authentic writ, which could prove that the Islam is continuation of the Judaism and the Christianity, because also Isa (Jesus) had proclaimed the coming of the last prophet after himself: And said Isa, the son of Mariam: “Oh, sons of Israel, I am sent by Allah to witness the Torah and to announce for messenger, who will come after me. His name is Allah. And when Mohammed brought them the patent signs, they said: “This is patent magic.” – Koran: suresi – Saff, ayet – 6. (Ahmed is one of the names of the prophet Mohammed, peace be with him).

Later I realized that there is no need to be looked for an authentic writ, while the Koran is on the Earth. With science development the authenticity of the Koran ayets reveal their nature. They do not belie the scientific facts, but unite with them.

Till here everything is good, but two things leave me not in peace – the walking round the Kaabe temple, which in the past was declared illogical three times and the 355 days in the year of Islam. I believe that there was a logic explanation, because it was said for the Almighty Allah that nothing of this He has created is motiveless. Everything he requires from His subordinates is with exact purpose. For example: prohibition on alcohol and pork consumption. The modern medicine back up this also. The human constitution is built up of proteins, and even the smallest alcohol dose destroys the proteins no matter where we are found - at the equator or on the North Pole. As to pork – this is one of the most unhygienic animals, besides omnivorous, and its meat is with high content of fats. From medical point of view fasting is also healthy for human constitution. I have thought about these things and I did not found anything harmful for the human nature, because of that I believe that walking round the temple has also its explanation. Then I remembered my grandfather’s stories. As my brothers and I were children he told us about the black stone in Mekka, that it hangs in the air without touching the ground. I really wanted to see that, but there was no chance of this to happen. I began to look for another explanation. I look for something related with the number seven, because it is walking round the temple seven times. First comes into my mind the relation to the week – it consists of seven days, the change of the day and night carries out thanks to the Earth’s rotation around its axis toward the Sun. the planet has no stay under itself and I told myself “yes, that is: the waling round the temple symbolize the days of the week”. For a week I held this version. This happened at the end of March and at the beginning of April in 2000. But one evening while I was waiting for the animals to come back from pasture, I stood in the yard near the hence and for a long time I watched the Moon and the Sun. The sun went down. And the moon was in lunar phase new moon and moved in the same direction to the sunset. Then I remembered the movie, which describes the Usuf’s (Joseph’s) life when he was still a young man. Once he dreamed that the Sun, the Moon and eleven stars obeyed him. From my grandfather’s stories I remembered the dream of a person, the founder of the Ottoman empire, Osmancik. When he had been a young man he dreamed that from his chest spring up a tree, which grew so much that its branches covered the world in four directions, to where would extend his possession. Then I said that if I have such a dream I would follow it, wherever it leads me. The sun has already gone down, but I still watched the moon, then it came into my mind, that as the moon rotate around the earth, so the earth rotate around the sun along with the other planets from the solar system and I told myself – it is more likely Kaabe to symbolize the solar system, the cube symbolize the sun, and the people are symbol of the planets – Fig.2 and Fig.8.

The same night in my dream I was at the same place in the yard and watched the moon. Suddenly from the moon began to come out other moons. Three moons came out and got settled in a triangle under the Moon – Fig.9 and came down on the earth in front of me. One of them fell in front of me, and the other two fell on the other side of the hence. I took this one in front of me, jumped over the hence and took also the other two. Then I went back in the yard. When I looked in my hands I saw three scythes in golden moon color. The first thing that came up in my head was “these scythes has no handles, I could not mow with them”. In this moment came my parents and I hid the moons behind my back. They asked me why am I not in bed, it had been too late. I answered “yes, it is really late, you go I will come in a while”. When I woke up in the morning I did not know if should tell about this. When I told about the dream my father laughed at me and said that it is impossible to happen such a thing. And my mother said that sometimes in dreams happen such things.

At this time I constantly thought about God, about the religions, about the meaning and the role of the prophets, about the holy writs. Because of that I believed that these three moons have a meaning connected with the religions, but I did not understand why they were sent to me. I told myself there are so many people in the world who know the Koran from beginning to end by rote, and I knew only one suresi and I still did not know how to pray Salah, I fasted even more as needed. I could not share entirely my conceptions with my family, I only hinted parts of them. I constantly was looking for a connection with the reality. After this dream I believed that I have already found the way. Then I thought again of my grandfathers stories about the dream’s meaning. At his time the smoking of handmade cigarettes was forbidden. If you want to smoke you should buy factory-made cigarettes. Every time when my grandfather dreamed the coming of the surveyors, in the morning he left the packet of tobacco at home and when they came they found nothing with him. Once he ignored his dream and in the morning when he went in the field he took also the packet of tobacco. While he was working in the field he saw in the distance that the surveyors were coming, he managed to hide the cigarettes but since this day he did not ignore his dreams any more.

For me the dream of one my classmate in the secondary school has impressed me deeply. It was in 1998 – May or June, we were in the fourth course of our secondary education and we have to draw nearly eight class projects. The implementation time was limited. Sometimes we were drawing till the morning. One night we were four or five students in the lodging. The time was two or three o’clock in the morning I was still drawing and the other boys had just gone in beds to rest. In a while one of them woke up and began to cry “we are finished, tomorrow all of us will fail the exam, and only one will take it. He looked at me and said – “this will be you”. During this time the other woke up, too. They did not understand what was happening and he carried on “I dreamed this four years ago when we were in the first course. The same people were in the same room, in the same situation. And in the morning we failed the exam, only you took it”. I was also in suspense because of the exam but I was better prepared as they were. During the four years of education I was conscious and consistent student. On the next day the dream of my classmate came true – only I took the exam. That impressed me deeply. He had dreamed four years ago how things would take their course at the end of the school process. The truth is that this happening strengthened my belief in the dreams’ meaning.

Because of the three moons in my dream in the spring of 2000 I thought in the course of two years that the Kaabe temple and the seven times walking round it is symbol of the solar system. During all this time I was looking for a connection with the number seven, but I did not found it. However, the number seven has neither connection with the Earth’s rotation on the orbit, or with the number of the planets in the solar system. In March, 2002 I went to work in Holland. I did not take the books with me, because of known reasons. There I continued with my reasoning. The solar system does not fulfil the requirements concerning the number seven. Then I thought of the galaxy, where we are found. It also has a center, round which are rotating its stars. In the course of six months I lived with the thoughts, that Kaabe symbolizes the galaxy, where we are found, as Kaabe(the cube) is symbol of galactic center, and the people are symbol of the stars. But again there was no connection with the number seven. For a short period of time I had accepted that the galactic braches could be seven. But here rose the question about the other galaxies, which number is about billions. If Kaabe symbolizes the Milky Way, was it possible the other galaxies have other divinities. But this is contrary to the principles for monotheism in the Islam. In Holland I lived with my brother in lodging. One day we came back from shopping and we would go out shopping again. We sat down for a while and I began to reason about these motions. It did not turn out but I felt that I will reach some conclusion. It was clear that it was not the Milky Way (the galaxy). I came back in the beginning and decided to strike a balance, what about did I reason till now. And jet the rotation of the Earth round its axis and on the orbit should not be ignored. And so I began to list:

First: Earth’s rotation around its own axis
Second: Earth’s rotation on the orbit around the Sun
Third: Sun’s rotation around its own axis
Fourth: Sun’s rotation on the orbit around the galactic axis
Fifth: Galaxy’s rotation around its own axis

For the first time I managed to come to the number five, and the way seems to be logic. Then I gave up going out with my brother. I told him that I want to reach the number seven and he decided to wait for me. I thought of the physics manual for 10.class and of the other astronomical books I read in Bulgaria. I know from them that the galaxies form heaps of galaxies. So I revealed the sixth stage. Then left only the seventh stage. Short after that I thought of the overgalactic heap – the heap formed from other galactic heaps. At last I came to the number seven. I drew up the seven stages on a fax-paper. It was difficult to understand the scheme without my explanations. In the evening I went to the mosque Mescidi – Aksa in Den Haag (Hague), Holland /in Holland all big mosques have names / to consult an imam. The aim of my consultation was to make certain that I am not in error. I did not want to do harm to the Islam, because I made no pretence to know the Islam excellent (because of some political systems, which were against Islamic education I was deprived of the opportunity to know my religion). When I explained the scheme the imam excused that he was very tired, because it was a holiday, and on holidays their programme was full of obligations. In the morning they taught little children reading of Koran, in the afternoon they taught teenagers, and in the evening – adults. And we put off this conversation. I also was in the group of the adults. But I joined later and the other were advanced. My aim was not to overtake them, because I stammer and I knew that I won’t be good in reading of Koran. I was interested in the meaning, in the nature of the Koran’s ayets, because I knew that some day I will step forward and will speak in my support. Because of that I asked the imam to use my time for clarifying of my questions instead of reading. He did not agree, he believed that some day I will cope with the reading, but he agreed clarify my questions in some of the other days of the week (I know that it could be better, as well as it could be worst. I do not complain of my stammering. I thank God for that what I am). After that I noticed that every time when I tried to ask him about the scheme with the hierarchical order of the bodies, he found some excuse to get out of the situation.

One night in the same mosque I began to read Koran, translated into Turkish language and marked some ayets, which I did not understand. I went to the imam and asked him to make me clear their meaning. He agreed with pleasure explained me the meaning of these ayets. In the course of the conversation little by little I began to speak about the seven stages. The conversation was interesting for the both sides; we were talking till the time for the next prayer. I told him about my conceptions, about the three moons, about the scientific point of view. Thanks to his explanations I made substantial correctors in my conceptions. He explained me that the Koran does not reject the science but encourages it. After this conversation he said me that if I have some question I can always refer to him. I think I managed to draw his attention. He forbad me to talk with other people about the three moons. Three or four months after that in a Pakistan mosque I asked through an interpreter about the meaning of the moons. They said that they did not know but they also forbad me to talk about this in front of other people. If the moons had some meaning, some day I would understand it. I did not know if they have some meaning, but they were my stimulus to come to the seventh stage in the hierarchical order of the bodies.

In the end of 2003 I came back in Bulgaria. The first thing I have to do was to gather all my books. After that I drew each one hierarchical row on a separate sheet of paper. So the scheme became clearer. In the middle of 2004 I decided to share all my conceptions with Islamic teachers. They praised my tenacity and perseverance. But they did not endorse my final aim: I want to appeal to all world leaders of not Islamic societies to adopt the Islam for their religion and ti call their nations to the same. “What will happen if in while finds out that there is also eighth stage”, were they worried about. Is there an eighth stage in the hierarchical order? A scientific answer of this question can give only the astronomers. But according to my logic, thanks to which I came to the seventh stage, there couldn’t be an eighth stage. My only arguments are the ayets from the Koran. If I have understood them rightly, it is said that the world (the Universe) consists of seven heavens.

The Koran is the speech of the Almighty Allah. In the Koran is described the way the world is created. And the human in his drive to know the world, gathers and systematizes his knowledge and in this way founds a science. The science researches, studies the created things, the things which already exists. Because of that it will be too naive on my part to put the science above the Creator’s speech or to put the science on an equal level with His Speech. Nobody knows everything. As much we know as much we are convinced of that, how many things we do not know. But there is no ayet in the Koran, which rejects the achievements of the human knowledge. But all this, so far as it goes, confirms, that the Koran is Allah’s speech. According to my conception the hierarchical order of the bodies coincide with the development of the world (Universe), described in the Koran.

In contrast to the teachers I do not impose my views, on the contrary I table them for discussion. Isn’t school for this, we to strive for the truth – such as it is. The hierarchical order of the bodies in the Universe is like a perfect watch – each following stage consists of exact determinate periods from the previous one, as it is with the watch’s hands. Nothing from this I showed them (the teachers) contradicts the Koran and the science. Despite this they did not want to back me up. In my opinion the reasons about that were two: first one was that they did not understand what I showed them. The way was beyond their knowledge. The second one was that they appraised my outlook not me. I was much younger than they were. I didn’t have Islamic education (actually that was the reason to consult them). At this time I was unemployed, because of that they advised me to give up my ideas and find a job. They accused me also of other things. After this meeting I understood that the things won’t happen so quickly as I wish. At this time I was reasoning about other four questions, which I was interested in. but I give up to work out them, because in the near future nobody will pay attention to all this. I carried on only the idea for the hierarchical order of the bodies. This idea was the most wide-ranging in comparison to the other. In the beginning of 2005 I took an offer for job in my village. My decision might be wrong but at this time I wanted some quiet and calm job to develop my ideas better in peace. In the same year I enrolled in a foreign higher educational institution, in a correspondence course (Kiev Slavonic University), which later was declared illegal by the Ministry of education. My aim was to acquire computer skills, in order to spread my ideas through internet as keep my identity in secret. After that I decided to go in the observatory in the town to seek information about the periods of sixth and seventh hierarchical row. The personnel in the observatory were very kind and cooperated me, but we did not found anything.

Next year, in August 2006, I went again to the observatory. I came to know that in the autumn we are going to study the discipline “Religion” at the university. Because of that I want to be well prepared, in order not to be surprised. I was received by the astronomer of the observatory. I explained him what I am looking for. I brought with me previously drawn up sixth and seventh stage. The astronomer explained me that determination of these periods is almost impossible. He told me about the difficulties which appeared. He gave me lectures with the reservation that I will give them back till 15 of September, because they were prepared for a lector, who will read them in front of students. I learned form this lectures that the 355 days in the year of Islam were determined according to the lunar calendar. I think that I as well as my teachers in the past did not know about this fact, but they pointed it as a mistake. Before find the answer of the question about 355 days supposed that there was another coincidence of the numbers in percentage connected with the human DNA. In a spatial coordinative system the orbit of the Earth in transverse profile is closed (with elliptic form), and in a longitudinal profile it is open (with spiral form). In other words: the point, where it is found in a certain moment will move aside in a year at a distance equal to the speed of the Sun for a second multiplied by the number of seconds, containing in a year). I thought that the difference between the solar and the lunar calendar could coincide with the DNA difference between human and animals, because of the spiral motion of the Earth around the Sun in the space. But now when I know that there is question of the lunar cycle, my version dropped off.

In September I went to give back the lectures. The astronomer and i started talking and he asked me what I was trying to do, what was my purpose? I told him that I want to know how many times we are rotating in the Universe, and he answered - “I have never thought about this”. I told him that I have already made the scheme and he wanted to see it. And I replied that some day I can show it him. Actually I had already defended my thesis in front of the astronomer without showing him the scheme. I showed him only sixth and seventh stage, which I have drawn on separate sheets of paper. In the evening when I came back home I heard in the news the announcement of Pope Benedict XVI in front of group of students, with which the pope tried to ruin the prestige of the Islam and the Prophet. First I could not believe that it happens such a thing – world leader of a society was ruing the values of other society. It happened in the beginning of second course at the university. After a month we should have lectures in Political science. The lector wandered from the subject and started speaking about religion. Then he discussed the pope’s announcement and spoke in support of his position as insulted Allah and Prophet Mohammed. About the Koran he said that it is written in such way, that there is in it no contradiction. For the Moslems he said that all of them, who blindly believe in the Koran, are washed brains.

For a long time I was waiting for the lectures in religion to talk with the lector on a university level. But his anger was as a big hindrance. I could not withhold and I took part in the conversation. I reminded him of his words from first course of the university, and then he was teaching in another discipline. At that time he taught us, that God has created the world for six days. He replied “I said that God has created the world for six days, because it is said by all monotheistic religions”. I retorted, that the Universe is object of research on part of the astronomy, and that the astronomy consists of two exact sciences – physic and mathematic. Two sciences, which took no one’s side, but show only the truth. My lector answered that the Universe is a virtual reality. Because of the fact that I haven’t a unilingual dictionary with me I asked an official in the inspectorate to give an exact definition of the words “virtual reality”. They meant following: “something that we assume it exists, in other words it could not exist in the space”. In this train of thought the mankind /altogether the life/ could be there or not. The same lector in political science gave us some lectures, in which it was said that after the made scientific findings came the end of the religions. The world scientist had stated that the religions have had no place in the laws of the Universe. For the Christianity he said that despite all it should be maintained, because there were put in it many resources. According to me this is an humiliating argument for a self-estimating teacher (university lector). Where is the striving for the truth? When I told him that my point of view does not coincide with his, he replied: “I see that I have read something from somewhere, these ideas are not come in your head from the heaven”. I asked him, “Isn’t it possible these conceptions be mine?” And he answered mockingly “There are in the world many people, who are thinking of these things, it is not your job”.

The only reason why I did not disclose entirely my conceptions in front of this lector was that soon we would have lectures in religion. After all this I went to another Moslem official and told him about the lector’s behaviour at the university and about my ideas and intentions. My expectations were the same – I expected support from religious point of view. Of course he refused to back me up. He compared the conversation between the lector and me with a conversation between two women on the street: the one is reputable and the other is not. A reputable woman does not have to degrade to the level of the unreputable woman, in order to argue with her. It was useless.

It came the time of the lectures in religion. The lecture entered, introduced himself and his way of work. He wanted from us to ask him questions and he will answer. That was his way of work. That was very convenient for me. The situation was simple: there were two lectors, the one of them rejected the religions, and the other defended them and a student, who was interested in the subject and was listening to them with undivided attention. I told the second lector about the arguments of the first one, but I did not get an exact answer. The lector in religion wanted to see the book, from which I have obtained my knowledge, because it looked like my grandmother told me all this. I was prepared for this. I showed him the books and the scheme with the hierarchical order of the bodies in the Cosmos. I offered him to disprove my conceptions about the reality, to defend his position and if he managed to convince me I am ready to accept what he taught me. After that I made clear that we do not found in a church or mosque, that was a higher educational institution (a temple of the knowledge, as many of the lector said), and we should not be completely submissive. He said that he did not understand what I show him. I told him that it is not necessary to understand it, because I have already defended it in front of astronomer – director of astronomic observatory.

I must admit that among all lectors, who took up some position on religion, the lector in religion was the only one whose attitude was worthy. He was not angry (apparently at least) in comparison with the other lectors. He even gave me instructions how to write my essay.

In the end of March 2007 we had lectures in psychology. I didn’t know that this discipline will range over the themes of religion. Because of that I did not take with me the needed materials. While the lector was reading his lectures I mentioned, that this what he was saying has no place in the laws of the Universe, but he did not pay attention to my words. In a while I said the same thing once again and then he replied: “I also have some pearls, but they are not for swine, they will not appreciate them”. All students in the course and he began laughing. I asked him: “Should I understand that you said I am a swine? Everybody stopped laughing, it fell silent. I decided to break the silent and said: “could you share your “pearls” with us, and we become enlightened like you!” He asked me about my name and I told them him. Then he said “Do you know what, you could be enlightened from God”. I replied that the answer is not adequate. I reminded him that we were found in a university, where we should put questions and search for answers. I told him that I have at home schemes of the Universe, defended in front of an astronomer and that his lectures have nothing to do with them. On the next day after the lecture I showed him the scheme of the hierarchical order of the bodies. He asked me, why did I do all this? I replied – “why there are wars?” he said that my question is too complicated. I tried to explain how I came to these conclusions. Then he said “I think just like you, but I do not have time for this now”, he took his bag and went out. It was clear for me that in the university nobody will pay attention to my conclusions.

I could not make out the behaviour of another lector, who was teaching in economic disciplines. He did not speak about religion and we did not ask him about this. But on the day of the exam, he came and his first words were “do not pretend to be religious. In the Bible as well as in the Koran is said that those people, who speak constantly of God, are breaking His law most. He looked at me, smiled and said: “Let’s go on with the exam”. I told some people about the lector’s behaviour. I did not know if he learned about this. The next semester we had lectures with him again and he said: “I do not tell you, not to defend your ideas, the schools are for this, but do this proper”. If I take that he was speaking of me “to defend my ideas in the proper way”. But not I called the teachers (lectors) “washed brains or swine”.

After all this I decided to show the whole scheme of the astronomer. I had several identical drawn schemes, excluding the last scheme, where the place wasn’t enough to draw the Kaabe temple. I showed the astronomer exact this scheme. I still did not want to tell him what it is about, because until now all lectors, who had sawn the whole scheme, had changed their faces. When the astronomer saw the scheme said: “you have drawn the hierarchical order of the bodies”. He liked it. He advised me how I can complement it. I reminded him that this is the reason why I was looking for information about the period’s duration of sixth and seventh stage. He offered me to leave my schemes there. Later he would look for information about them and in a week I could take them back. When I passed by in a week he said that there had been arisen unforeseen circumstances and he could not seek the needed information. He said that sixth and seventh stages are not correct. In reality the heaps were more complicated. They do not lie in one orbit. I drew other variants when I came back at home.

In a month I gathered all my materials in a bag and went again in the observatory to show them. When the astronomer saw the bag he joked, he asked me if I didn’t draw a nuclear bomb. I said that if it turns out that I am right, its power could be the same like a bomb.

I showed him the new schemes of sixth and seventh stage, but he did not approve them. The galactic heaps were two strips on one circumference, he said. I asked if that was as a result of primary explosion. He answered that it is so assumed. At the end I showed him the scheme, where was pictured also the temple. The astronomer asked me, if I am sure that the bodies are positioned just like this. I replied that I do not make a plan of the Universe, but only one scheme of bodies’ motion. At one time he began rejecting everything I said. I wanted to see his reactions and said: “It seems that I waste my time, it will be better if I give up all this. And jet I did not learn astronomy and it is hardly possible to make a contribution to this sphere”. Then he said “No, I do not tell you give up your ideas. There are so many people, who are not astronomers, but they contributed to this sphere. All this is correct, but I do not accept it”. My question was “why”. “Because it contradicts the Christianity” he answered. He also honored the Jesus Christ’s crucifix. Then I made clear the Koran’s position about the Jesus Christ’s crucifix. It is said in the Koran that Allah had saved Jesus from the crucifixion, and the crucified was liken to Jesus. I showed him my essay in religion, which I had to write. In the Koran are mentioned twenty five prophets and among them are Moses and Jesus Christ. It is said about them “We have sent them and we gave them the Scriptures”. Besides this I showed him the meaning of some ayets from the Koran, which coincide with the scientific discoveries I had mentioned in my essay. For example: the Universe expansion, the birth of the life from the water, plants’ pollination through the wind, planets’ motion (the process of mountains’ formation) etc. and asked when these truths were theoretically well-grounded. He answered that the Universe expansion is scientific discovery of twentieth century. Despite all these facts, it is an absurd for him to accept, that somebody has dictated the Koran from the heaven and the prophet on the earth has written it down. According to him the resemblance between the bodies in the Cosmos and the Kaabe temple are a by a fortune.

I told him about the lector’s behaviour in the university and expressed my astonishment about this, what they were resting on when they abused and got angry with all in the heaven. His position was unconditional – such behaviour is not permissible at school.

When I was leaving he offered to give the address of a person in Sofia, who is engaged in extragalactic astronomy. An overall view of the Universe is beyond his possibilities.

In July I went to the rector. As a student in the university I want to be given the opportunity to defend my conceptions in front of experts and to say that I do not agree upon the content of some disciplines, we were studying at the university. The rector replied that it came the summer vacation and that in September when we come back at the university, he will spare time for me. September went by and the rector has still not invited me. I supposed that he might be bound up with other tasks, because of that on October 20, 2007 I left a written request, addressed to him.








































I would like being given an opportunity to defend my conceptions and convictions in front of the social elite beyond the Islam – led by the pope, cardinals, scientists - theologians, philosophers and psychologists; all cleric leaders of all societies beyond the Islam and scientists – physicians astronomers from NASA. I often asked the officials, who were engaged with the documentation in the university, about my request, which I had left for the rector. But every time I received different answer. In nine months the rector appeared and I decided to wait for him finish with the exams. After the exam from the personnel let him know that I have left a request, addressed to him. The rector spared time for me, he listened to me and said that he is against the forcible imposing of the Islam, whatever does it mean. After that he mention a name of a person, who died. He said that he knows a little bit more than me about this subject. He gave me not a final answer and went away. At the end I decided to place all this at the disposal of the media. I think that the society has the right to know about all this.

Most of the lectors said that the university is the place, where we can defend our ideas. I think they are right. Because of that I put my questions and look for their answers. But the interesting thing was that the teachers avoid this theme. Similar case was, when one of the lectors said that “thanks to the culture we have got down from the trees”. I tried to ask a question, but he often repeated “Ah, I have so many things to tell you, but I do not have enough time”. From this could be drawn only one conclusion. He said “Listen to me, but do not ask me questions”. Basically this theory that the people had got down from the trees, in other words that the people had derived from monkeys, rejects God’s existence and unity, rejects the mercy and humane attitude to the people with disabilities. This theory encouraged the hostility between the individuals as try to persuade them that the stronger survives. Because of that the founder of this theory as well as its defenders bear moral responsibility for the death of more than 120 million people, who became victims of the both World Wars. It follows from this that this theory lies in the basis of the evil in the world. It is strange that these teachers prepared us for the life. I remember another case. I was student in a secondary school during the corn crisis in 1997. The politicians took the bread from the hands of the people and they made a protest against the politicians in the National Assembly. My teacher in literature abused the remonstrants, because they were desecrating parliament’s building, which was “holy temple for the Bulgarian nation”. At that time the parliament’s building became “haunt for corrupt politicians”. Nothing was done in favour of the society. I would like to believe that since then the things has changed.

The foreign higher educational institution, where I am student (Kiev Slavonic University), was opened in these years by the then government, and the present government declared it illegal. After this announcement of the minister of education many students moved to other universities in near and distant cities. This cost them considerable sums, but actually the fault is not their. One again the present government blamed the previous government for “wrong” carried policy. We could not put the question – is this a worthy policy? It is pity that still today there are politicians who found their policy on hate and ethnical division. They first talk and after that they think about what they said (if they do it at all). Such politicians are like thorn in the flesh for the other countries in the world.

I would be glad if politicians do not place their opinion above this of the “scientist”, who should take a stand on this question (about the hierarchical order of the bodies in the Cosmos). I was honest. I told you about the way I came to my conclusions. I will be very glad if the scientist (teachers) analyze my conclusions, not the way I arrived at (I think that the way I arrived to these conclusions is logical and this concerns only me).

Some scientists stated the decline of the religions with the argument that after all these scientific discoveries there is no place for the religions in the Universe.

The astronomy researches the Universe. It is a physic-mathematical science. It seeks and requires exact answers and namely this science has to find out the continuance of the other stages – fifth, sixth and seventh stages of Earth’s rotation in the Universe.

Prophet Mohammed said in one of his hadiths: “Speculate on Allah’s deeds, but do not speculate on His identity, because you could not understand this”. The Universe is deed of the Almighty Allah, therefore we have right to speculate on its laws (its mechanics).

My conclusions are that through the pilgrimage in Mekka the Moslems manifest the harmony in the Universe. As student I would like to dispute this with the elite beyond the Islam – led by the pope, cardinals, scientists - theologians, philosophers and psychologists; all cleric leaders of all societies beyond the Islam and scientists – physicians, astronomers from NASA.

If they can not disprove this scheme, they should adopt the Islam as their religion and Allah as their only God, not together with other divinities. They should adopt the Koran as Holy Writ and Prophet Mohammed as the last prophet sent by the Almighty Allah for the whole mankind. They should invoke their nations follow them, in order their souls be saved on the Judging Day. In the Koran the Almighty Allah ordained: “there is only one religion for Allah – the Islam” – Suresi – AliImran, ayet 85.

It is possible I did not understand the things, let’s they disprove my conceptions about the reality and defend their position with arguments (with facts) and invite me to follow them. And jet all is in the name of the truth.

Seyhan Yumer Kadir – student at Kiev Slavonic University
Republic of Bulgaria, town of Kardzhali

Bibliography:
1. Physics manual for 10.class
2. Извечньi тайньi неба
3. World religious beliefs
4. Basis of the faith and ibadet in Islam
5. Internet sources
6. Lectures in: Political science, Philosophy, Science about the religions

Translation from Bulgarian into English

1.International Charter of Human Rights
1.1. Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948.
(Bulgarian Helsinki Committee)

Adopted and proclaimed by resolution 217A (III) of the UN General Assembly of 10.12.1948 issued in a collection of international documents in the year of 1992

Art. 18 Everyone has the right of freedom of thoughts, conscience and religion: this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief and freedom to profess their beliefs or reigiyata, individually or collectively, publicly or privately, through training, practice, worship and rituals .

Art. 19 Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression: this right includes freedom to adhere to their beliefs and the right to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.

European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms

Issued by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, suppl. V2 protocol with years of 06.0.1963, amended. Protocol V to 3 years 06/05/1963, Protocol № 5 years 20/01/1966, Minutes № 8 years 1.03.1985 ratified with a law passed by the National Assembly on July 31, 1992 - SG 66 of 14.08.1992 years, publ. SG br.80 years from 02.10.1992, in force from 07.09.1992 years ……………………..

Article 9 Everyone has the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion: this right includes freedom to change his religion or belief and freedom to manifest his religion or belief either individually or collectively, publicly or privately, through worship, teaching, practice and observance.

Article 10 Everyone has the right to freedom of expression. this right includes freedom to hold opinions and to receive and impart information and ideas without interference by public authority and regardless of frontiers.

I the undersigned Adlen Adil Musa, personal Id No:8004282437, certify the authenticity of the applied translation from Bulgarian into English.The translation consists of 1 pages. Translater……….